The Necks

January 29th, 2010

necks-tuning

It’s not so much hearing things happen. It’s more like noticing that things have changed, and now it’s time to re-assess your surroundings. It’s not so much listening for individual motivic and textural changes. It’s more like looking at time-lapse photography. It’s not so much seeing it all happen sped up. It’s more like looking at each image for a full minute or two. It’s not so much like noticing the movement of forms in the photo. It’s more like noticing the movement of color and shadows, whether random or patterned.

As a direct consequence of stretching one moment into such a duration, the slightest changes become tectonic shifts.

The Necks’ music comes in pockets, in revolutions per second that sometimes are very slow, and other times are very fast. Still other times, slow moments are superimposed on percussion patterns approaching twenty Hertz, the lower range of audible frequency. Phantom sounds come from Chris Abrahams’ piano strings, or maybe from Lloyd Swanton’s bass bowing in the upper registers. They could also be coming from how Tony Buck drags a cymbal across another cymbal.

It’s not so much hearing things happen. It’s more like noticing that a cymbal, dragged across another cymbal, makes an interesting sound. It’s not so much taking in the novelty of this technique. After enough time has passed, it ceases being a novelty act and fixes itself in your ear. It’s not a conscious effort at hearing this sound. After enough time has passed, the sound of the cymbal is taken for granted.

As a direct consequence of repeating one sound again and again, the slightest changes in timbre are audible.

The Necks’ music ceases inaudibly. In revolutions per second, whether very slow or very fast, we expect continuity. Still other times, we expect that these revolutions will continue, albeit slightly changed. Staring at the sun for too long will leave a spot in your eyes, where the eyes expected the sun to be. They could also be happening from too much exhaustion, as the sun tires your eyes out.

It’s not so much hearing. Things happen, and it’s more like you know they’ve happened and your ears expect them to keep happening. It’s not so much active-listening. It’s more like accepting and observing, because there are no other choices available. It’s so much continuing to hear. It’s hearing things as they change, and forgetting that they were even still there to begin with. It’s hearing not the things, but how the things have already disappeared. After the things disappear, they leave a spot in your ear, like the sun and your eyes.

Leave a comment

Between a sigh and a yell

January 14th, 2010

The yells came few and far between during Nate Wooley and Audrey Chen’s half-hour improvisation last Tuesday night. Mostly sighs, mostly whispers, and you think I’m kidding but when Chen bowed the side of her cello and Nate just blew air through his trumpet it was indistinguishable.

I’ve seen lots of improvisors in my time here, and one of the remarkable parts of a performance–what shows the character of the performer, more than anything else–is the ending. There was a time during this performance when it felt like it was over. Nate looked around a bit, and Chen just sat with her eyes closed. After about a minute of this, she began to bow the side of the cello again. It wasn’t over; she seemed to say, that just felt too right to end there and that right-feeling was unbearable.

Leave a comment

Biomuseick

January 8th, 2010

I had a long discussion after this concert with a fellow ISSUE volunteer about conceptual art and how to judge it and we incorporated so many caveats and exceptions that I’m not sure we were left with anything categorical. Maybe this is why we rely on art critics to tell us that Damien Hirst is all he’s cracked up to be. He made the comment that if someone just handed you this recording (Eric Lyon’s Biomuse Trio, for violinist, laptop, and “biomuse,” or person hooked up to brain wave sensors and all kinds of other electrodes) would it lose all of its meaning?

Probably. The whole brain-wave process was so masked in new-agey washes of reverb and filtering, and the movement was so controlled and filtered for the desired result that you may as well have been listening to something that was completely pre-determined. Which seems to be the issue: the group did an incredible job at reverse-engineering the music, starting with a desired result (particular ways of stretching the violin sound, intuitively-controlled sample manipulation) and working backwards until they trained the biomuse and his sensors to achieve these results. “Biomuse,” then, is a sort of misnomer: he’s not the muse, but an instrument. He is, at best, a conduit through which the information passes. In some parts, when his brainwaves were in full audible display, the rhythms of his brain were actually projected into the room and it was unpredictable and sort of mystical. But this was so couched in lush textures and happened so infrequently for no real extended duration that it was more of a single element than a sustained thought.

This technology, so well-tuned, has the potential to be a wonderful exploration into the invasion of privacy: you sit your biomuse in a chair, project his or her brainwaves through the room over loudspeakers, and begin to read the New York Times aloud (or, depending on your biomuse’s political leanings and your own sadistic tendencies, just turn on Fox News). As the biomuse gets increasingly agitated–no matter how much he or she tries to hide it–it will be projected into the room. Any volunteers?

Leave a comment

Science is Only a Sometimes Friend

January 8th, 2010

This concert actually happened long ago, and I seem to have forgotten that I had committed to writing about just one concert a week. I should have kept them stored up or something so that I could post while I was gone.

Anyway, my friend Matthew Walker is the other half of the Free Music Archive’s ISSUE Project Room division, and he wrote a great piece on Aaron Siegel’s Science is Only a Sometimes Friend. It’s got eight glockenspiels and an organ that’s not so much a thing as the ground the thing sits on. If that made no sense, read the post and listen to the performance.

Leave a comment